Abstract
A B S T R A C T S Conclusions: The two techniques, following the international guidelines recommendations, should not interfere one another. They indeed should have two separated and independent target populations or eventually just a small overlap. We could aspect an increase of total number of patients operations due to the introduction of a target population but this did not occur. We can conclude that the TAVI usage did not increase significantly the arrival of new patients and we can see that the standard biological valve implants that were supposed to stay unmodified or increased due to the increase of attractiveness of this technique, did not occur. The decreasing trend of standard valve, negatively affected by the TAV
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
