Abstract

The cause of cracks in concrete is traditionally estimated by analyzing information such as patterns and locations of the cracks and whether other defects are present, followed by aggregating the findings to estimate the cause. This method is highly dependent on the expert’s knowledge and experience in the process of identifying the cause of the cracks by compiling information related to the occurrence of the cracks, and it is likely that each expert will make a different diagnosis or an expert with insufficient knowledge and experience will make an inaccurate diagnosis. Therefore, we propose automated technology using the ontology to improve the consistency and accuracy of crack diagnosis results in this research. The proposed approach uses information on the crack patterns, locations, and penetration status, as well as the occurrence of other defects, to automatically infer the causes of cracks. We developed ontology that can infer the cause of cracks using the information on their appearance and applied actual cases of cracks to verify the ontological operation. In addition, the consistency and accuracy of the ontology were validated using eight actual cases of crack. The approach of this study can support expert decision-making in the crack diagnosis process, thereby reducing the possibility of various errors caused by the intervention of inaccurate judgments in the crack diagnosis process and improving the efficiency of the crack diagnosis tasks.

Highlights

  • Since the invention of artificial cement, it has been used as the main building material in most of the man-made structures on Earth, including buildings

  • We examined the limitations of crack diagnosis work in the existing literature and via expert interviews to extract important information on the practice of crack diagnosis and to realize expertise related to estimating the causes of cracks as ontology

  • Elements that determine the type of crack and elements that define the cause of the crack are constructed on a site to recognize the crack information obtained by visual inspection to automate the process of diagnosing the cause of the crack to achieve greater accuracy and consistency than the existing method. For this automation to be possible, the establishment of “Crack Type Ontology (CTO)”, which consists of factors that determine the type of crack, and “Crack Cause Ontology (CCO)”, which consists of factors that define the cause of the crack, should be preceded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the invention of artificial cement, it has been used as the main building material in most of the man-made structures on Earth, including buildings. This study aims to present a method of estimating the cause of cracks applicable to reality by focusing on solving problems in which different experts can make different diagnoses or non-professionals cannot make accurate diagnoses due to their high reliance on expert knowledge and experience. To this end, we examined the limitations of crack diagnosis work in the existing literature and via expert interviews to extract important information on the practice of crack diagnosis and to realize expertise related to estimating the causes of cracks as ontology.

Crack Diagnosis Practice
Crack Cause Estimation
Limitations of Crack Diagnosis Practice
Previous Research on Crack Diagnosis
Ontology in Construction
Concept of Automated Inferring Crack Cause
Literature
Definition of Property
Semantic Reasoning and Query
Validation
Long-Term Load over Design Load
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.