Abstract
Inflorescences are usually designed as closed or open, referring to the presence or absence of a terminal flower (TF), respectively. Until now, it was unknown how much developmental constraints in the inflorescence meristem (IM) determined the production of the TF. To face this question, we carried out a quantitative study of inflorescence development including 19 species from four families of the eudicots (Berberidaceae, Papaveraceae-Fumarioideae, Rosaceae, and Campanulaceae). Our study shows that TFs appear on IMs that possess a certain relative surface, phyllotaxis, and convexity. IMs of open inflorescences show a significantly smaller relative surface (<50%), illustrating a morphological unsuitability for producing a TF. This smaller surface either is existent during the whole ontogeny (open I) or results from a drastic meristematic reduction after flower initiation (open II). We conclude that the TF arises as a consequence of a suitable bulge formation of the IM after a suitable dynamic of the ontoge...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
