Abstract

Context. Differentiating between a true exoplanet signal and residual speckle noise is a key challenge in high-contrast imaging (HCI). Speckles result from a combination of fast, slow, and static wavefront aberrations introduced by atmospheric turbulence and instrument optics. While wavefront control techniques developed over the last decade have shown promise in minimizing fast atmospheric residuals, slow and static aberrations such as non-common path aberrations (NCPAs) remain a key limiting factor for exoplanet detection. NCPAs are not seen by the wavefront sensor (WFS) of the adaptive optics (AO) loop, hence the difficulty in correcting them. Aims. We propose to improve the identification and rejection of slow and static speckles in AO-corrected images. The algorithm known as the Direct Reinforcement Wavefront Heuristic Optimisation (DrWHO) performs a frequent compensation operation on static and quasi-static aberrations (including NCPAs) to boost image contrast. It is applicable to general-purpose AO systems as well as HCI systems. Methods. By changing the WFS reference at every iteration of the algorithm (a few tens of seconds), DrWHO changes the AO system point of convergence to lead it towards a compensation mechanism for the static and slow aberrations. References are calculated using an iterative lucky-imaging approach, where each iteration updates the WFS reference, ultimately favoring high-quality focal plane images. Results. We validated this concept through both numerical simulations and on-sky testing on the SCExAO instrument at the 8.2-m Subaru telescope. Simulations show a rapid convergence towards the correction of 82% of the NCPAs. On-sky tests were performed over a 10 min run in the visible (750 nm). We introduced a flux concentration (FC) metric to quantify the point spread function (PSF) quality and measure a 15.7% improvement compared to the pre-DrWHO image. Conclusions. The DrWHO algorithm is a robust focal-plane wavefront sensing calibration method that has been successfully demonstrated on-sky. It does not rely on a model and does not require wavefront sensor calibration or linearity. It is compatible with different wavefront control methods, and can be further optimized for speed and efficiency. The algorithm is ready to be incorporated in scientific observations, enabling better PSF quality and stability during observations.

Highlights

  • Over the past 30 years, Adaptive Optics (AO) instrumentation has undergone extensive development in terms of its sophistication and scientific capabilities

  • We looked for simulating an AO close to the Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO) instrument, which is a high-order AO system mounted behind Subaru’s facility adaptive optics AO188 (Minowa et al 2010) that provides a first level of correction using a 188-actuator deformable mirror (DM) and a curvature wavefront sensor (WFS)

  • In order to better understand the impact on the optical path difference (OPD), we used the Maréchal approximation with σΦ being the variance of the phase and σOPD being the variance of the OPD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past 30 years, Adaptive Optics (AO) instrumentation has undergone extensive development in terms of its sophistication and scientific capabilities. These aberrations can vary with temperature and mechanical deformation at timescales from minutes to hours, or with the positioning errors of moving optics, making them challenging to calibrate They are typically of the order of tens of nanometers, enough to lead to static and quasi static speckles in coronagraphic images (Sauvage et al 2007; Vigan et al 2019). In this paper we present the DrWHO algorithm, a model-free focal plane wavefront sensing approach that is aimed at finding the offset mentioned above to correct slow and static wavefront aberrations, including the NCPAs, on a timescale of a few seconds.

Pursuing a good WFS reference
Algorithm description
Validation via numerical simulations
Extreme AO simulation
Method Basis
DrWHO on COMPASS
Results in terms of PSF quality
Results in terms of modes corrected
PSF quality Flux criteria
DrWHO on SCExAO
Observation setup
Evolution of the PSF quality
Mapping between WFS and PSF
The problem of dimensionality
DrWHO characteristics
Result
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call