Abstract

We consider a class of on-shell constrained mass variables that are 3+1 dimensional generalizations of the Cambridge $M_{T2}$ variable and that automatically incorporate various assumptions about the underlying event topology. The presence of additional on-shell constraints causes their kinematic distributions to exhibit sharper endpoints than the usual $M_{T2}$ distribution. We study the mathematical properties of these new variables, e.g., the uniqueness of the solution selected by the minimization over the invisible particle 4-momenta. We then use this solution to reconstruct the masses of various particles along the decay chain. We propose several tests for validating the assumed event topology in missing energy events from new physics. The tests are able to determine: 1) whether the decays in the event are two-body or three-body, 2) if the decay is two-body, whether the intermediate resonances in the two decay chains are the same, and 3) the exact sequence in which the visible particles are emitted from each decay chain.

Highlights

  • The best known example is the invariant mass of visible particles observed in the detector

  • We study the mathematical properties of these on-shell constrained M2 kinematic variables and propose several novel techniques for mass measurements and for disambiguating alternative event topologies

  • We find that differential distributions of the constrained M2 variables exhibit sharper kinematic endpoints, making them easier to measure in the presence of backgrounds

Read more

Summary

The physics process

In this paper we shall consider the generic processes depicted in figure 1. The process (2.1) depicted in figure 1 covers a large class of physically interesting and motivated scenarios, including dilepton events from top pair production and decay, stop decays in supersymmetry (t → b ν ), and many more. We shall assume that all four visible particles ai and bi in figure 1 are distinguishable. Another question is, which visible particles belong to the first decay chain (a1, b1) and which belong to the second (a2, b2). 3. when ai is distinguishable from bi, one could ask which of these two particles was emitted first and which came second. When ai is distinguishable from bi, one could ask which of these two particles was emitted first and which came second The answer to this question will be the subject of section 5.2

M2 subsystems and the particle family tree
Definition of the on-shell constrained M2 variables
Relations among the M2 type variables and MT 2
Uniqueness of the longitudinal momenta found by M2XX and M2CX
The variables M2XC and M2CC
Summary of the properties of the on-shell constrained M2 variables
Mass measurements
M2 kinematic endpoints and parent mass measurements
M2-assisted mass reconstruction of relative peaks
Using M2 variables for topology disambiguation
Endpoint test
Dalitz plot test
Resonance scatter plot test
Conclusions and outlook
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.