Abstract
BackgroundThis paper extends previous work describing course in depression using a recommended operational model that defines remission onset and relapse. We test whether a similar course pattern would emerge using this model in a new cohort of depressed participants. MethodsWe recruited a cohort of 86 participants, first-time inpatients, with DSM-IV major depression. Outcome was assessed prospectively over a 13-month minimum follow-up period. Remission onset was defined as a Ham-D score <8 for two consecutive weeks; relapse as a Ham-D score >16 for two consecutive weeks and meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. ResultsThe cumulative probability of remission onset was 0.62 (SE=0.05) and 0.80 (SE=0.05) at 3 and 6months following study entry. The relapse risk was 0.28 (SE=0.05) at 6months post remission onset; 53% of those relapsing did so in the first 2months post remission onset. Predictors of longer times to remission onset included: longer illness length, higher anxiety scores and unemployment; higher anxiety scores predicted relapse. The course pattern is similar to that reported previously. LimitationsThese findings apply to inpatients only. Course was not rated blind to all of the participants' baseline data. ConclusionsDefining remission onset and relapse using this model is associated with a replicable course pattern. A singular clinical advantage of the model is the identification of those participants at highest risk of relapse 2months post remission onset.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have