Abstract
Recently, crowdsensing receives extensive attentions to solve complex sensing tasks. However, these existing works mainly focus on the incentive issues of traditional bidding model. In practice, solutions of the incentive issues of the posted-pricing model, are more important for some realistic mobile crowdsensing (MCS) applications. However, only few works focus on the homogeneous MCS applications (each user can perform only a single task). To this end, in this article we propose a posted-pricing incentive mechanism for heterogeneous MCS applications (different users have different limits of the number of assignments). Furthermore, considering more general MCS applications (satisfying <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$</tex-math></inline-formula> -submodular function: the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$</tex-math></inline-formula> -set functions that are submodular in every type <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k\in [K]$</tex-math></inline-formula> ), we define the weighted marginal utilities and explore two posted-pricing incentive mechanisms for heterogeneous and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$</tex-math></inline-formula> -submodular MCS applications, respectively. Moreover, both of the two mechanisms are based not only on heterogeneous or <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$</tex-math></inline-formula> -submodular sensing tasks, but also on heterogeneous sensing types. Finally, performance analysis shows that our mechanisms satisfy the desired properties, such as the truthfulness of acceptance decision, the individual rationality,budget feasibility,computational efficiency, and the regret minimization. Through extensive simulations, we evaluate the performance and validate the theoretical properties of our proposed mechanism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.