Abstract

We sought to address the prior limitations of symptom checker accuracy by analysing the diagnostic and triage feasibility of online symptom checkers using a consecutive series of real-life emergency department (ED) patient encounters, and addressing a complex patient population - those with hepatitis C or HIV. We aimed to study the diagnostic and triage accuracy of these symptom checkers in relation to an emergency room physician-determined diagnosis. An ED retrospective analysis was performed on 8363 consecutive adult patients. Eligible patients included: 90 HIV, 67 hepatitis C, 11 both HIV and hepatitis C. Five online symptom checkers were utilised for diagnosis (Mayo Clinic, WebMD, Symptomate, Symcat, Isabel), three with triage capabilities. Symptom checker output was compared with ED physician-determined diagnosis data in regards to diagnostic accuracy and differential diagnosis listing, along with triage advice. All symptom checkers, whether for combined HIV and hepatitis C, HIV alone or hepatitis C alone had poor diagnostic accuracy in regards to Top1 (<20%), Top3 (<35%), Top10 (<40%), Listed at All (<45%). Significant variations existed for each individual symptom checker, as some appeared more accurate for listing the diagnosis in the top of the differential, vs. others more apt to list the diagnosis at all. In regards to ED triage data, a significantly higher percentage of hepatitis C patients (59.7%; 40/67) were found to have an initial diagnosis with emergent criteria than HIV patients (35.6%; 32/90). Symptom checker diagnostic capabilities are quite inferior to physician diagnostic capabilities. Complex patients such as those with HIV or hepatitis C may carry a more specific differential diagnosis, warranting symptom checkers to have diagnostic algorithms accounting for such complexity. Symptom checkers carry the potential for real-time epidemiologic monitoring of patient symptoms, as symptom entries and subsequent symptom checker diagnosis could allow health officials a means to track illnesses in specific patient populations and geographic regions. In order to do this, accurate and reliable symptom checkers are warranted.

Highlights

  • The number of emergency department (ED) visits has increased substantially over recent years, with concern for long wait times, decreased efficiency and patient satisfaction, provider fatigue, and drain of healthcare resources [1, 2]

  • Limited analysis to date has focused on symptom checker diagnostic and triage accuracy using predetermined academic clinical vignettes, with varying results depending on disease severity, commonality

  • We address the aforementioned limitations by analysing the feasibility of online symptom checkers using a consecutive series of real-life ED patient encounters, and addressing a complex patient population – those with HIV or hepatitis C – to see whether online symptom checkers are reliable diagnostic and triage tools for this complex, and ageing, patient population

Read more

Summary

Short Paper

A brief abstract was presented at the World Congress of Gastroenterology at ACG 2017. 13– 18 October 2017. A brief abstract was presented at the World Congress of Gastroenterology at ACG 2017. A brief published abstract can be found in the supplement version online at American Journal of Gastroenterology 2017; 112: S527-S530. Cite this article: Berry AC, Cash BD, Wang B, Mulekar MS, Van Haneghan AB, Yuquimpo K, Swaney A, Marshall MC, Green WK (2019). Online symptom checker diagnostic and triage accuracy for HIV and hepatitis C.

Short report
Summary
Findings
Mayo Clinic
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call