Abstract

Many power utilities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have inadequate generation capacity, unreliable services, and high costs. They also face capital constraints that restrict them from making the investments necessary for capacity expansion. Capacity shortages have compelled power utilities to use leased emergency power-generating units, mainly oil-fired diesel generators, as a short-term solution. An economic analysis is carried out to compare the economic net present value (ENPV) of fuel savings, as well as the greenhouse gas (GHG) savings, from investing capital in a solar PV power-generation plant with those from investing the same amount of funds into a diesel power plant. The results show that ENPV is negative for the solar PV plant, whereas it has a large positive value for the diesel plant. In addition, the diesel plant would be almost three times as effective in reducing GHG emissions as the same value of investment in the solar PV plant. Even with solar investment costs falling, it will take 12 to 24 years of continuous decline before solar PV becomes cost-effective for SSA. The capital cost of solar PV would need to drop to US$1058.4 per kW to yield the same level of ENPV as the diesel plant.

Highlights

  • It is well known that the power supply in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is unreliable

  • The following analysis first considers the option of investing in a solar PV plant, which will reduce the level of electricity currently generated by existing diesel and thermal power plants

  • The daily peak occurs during the evening hours in SSA countries, whereas the major share of the solar PV electricity is generated during the daytime period when the radiation is the highest

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is well known that the power supply in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is unreliable. Electrical power outages in SSA countries are woefully high; 13.9 outages per month in Benin, 7.2 in Gabon, and 32.7 in Central African Republic [1]. Inadequate power supplies impose heavy losses on the private sector. Unreliable supplies of electricity by national electric power utilities have forced many users, from households to large enterprises, to invest in backup generators and generate their own electricity [3,4,5,6]. Private power-generation units make up to 6% of total installed capacity in SSA, with the costs of generation varying between US$0.3 and 0.7 per kWh, which is often three times higher than buying the electricity from the public grid [5,7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call