Abstract

Agricultural practices can either contribute to pollinator decline or provide opportunities to support pollinator communities. At the landscape-scale, agriculture can have negative impacts on pollinators, especially pollinators that specialize on limited floral or nesting resources. While increasing floral resources at the field-scale is positive for pollinator communities, little is known about how it affects specialist bees that depend on a specific pollen source (oligoleges). We studied pollinators on small-scale farms that contrasted in crop diversity (monocultures versus polycultures), embedded in the intensively managed agriculture region of the San Joaquin Valley in California, to understand how wild bee communities and specialist bees would respond to field-scale diversification practices. We used squash (Cucurbita pepo) as our focal crop, because it is visited by both specialist pollinators, “squash bees” in the genera Peponapis and Xenoglossa, and by generalist bees like those in the genera Apis and Agapostemon. We hypothesized that there would be a greater number of squash bees on monoculture farms, which have abundant squash flowers, than on polyculture farms. Contrary to our predictions, we found that increasing the number of non-squash floral resources at the field-scale in agroecosystems supports a greater abundance of squash bees but has no effect on the diversity of bees visiting squash flowers. This pattern of increased abundance was consistent for other wild bees and the total number of bees (i.e. including honey bees), but not for honey bee abundance alone. Further, the abundance of pollinators increased or remained the same on polyculture farms throughout the morning while decreasing on monoculture farms, suggesting that as squash flowers start to close in midmorning, bees on the monocultures go elsewhere because no other floral resources co-occur. However, they remain on the polycultures where other resources co-occur. Thus, on-farm diversification may be an important refuge for both specialist bees and other pollinator species that are vulnerable to floral resource simplification and loss in landscapes dominated by monoculture agriculture.

Highlights

  • Global change patterns, including habitat alteration and climate change, are transforming ecosystems with negative effects on biodiversity and, reducing ecosystem functioning and compromising ecosystem services (IPBES, 2019)

  • Squash bee abundance was best explained by the model that included only farm type (w = 0.506) and a competing model that included the interaction between farm type and the proportion of agriculture (w = 0.331)

  • We hypothesized that squash monoculture fields would provide a substantial amount of pollen resources for specialist squash bees and have high squash bee abundances, in contrast, our results suggest that on-farm diversification supports a higher abundance of squash specialist bees (Peponapis spp. and Xenoglossa spp.), other wild bees, and honey bees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global change patterns, including habitat alteration and climate change, are transforming ecosystems with negative effects on biodiversity and, reducing ecosystem functioning and compromising ecosystem services (IPBES, 2019). Squash bees, Peponapis spp., expanded their range with the domestication and cultivation of squash throughout North America (Giannini et al, 2010; López-Uribe et al, 2016). These squash bees are solitary groundnesting species that require ground space near to their preferred pollen source for suitable nesting habitat (Hurd et al, 1974). While the importance of specialist pollinators to pollination has long been questioned (e.g., Waser et al, 1996; Larsson, 2005; Maldonado et al, 2013), studies indicate that bees with a narrow pollen diet (oligolecty) are rarer on agroecosystems (Wood et al, 2016; Amy et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.