Abstract
A numerical model for one-dimensional diffusion of oxygen into soil which incorporates a soil respiration function that decreases exponentially with depth, is compared with an analytical solution. The results show that the assumption of zero flux at the bottom boundary for the numerical solution means that the assumed depth to the bottom boundary, z n , is a critical parameter. The analytical solution shows that this boundary condition leads to two distinct oxygen concentration profiles. The first occurs when the oxygen concentration approaches a constant value, C∗, as z → ∞. The second occurs when the oxygen concentration goes to zero at some depth, L. With the analytical solution, the nature of the profile can be determined a priori and either C∗ or L calculated. With the numerical solution it is not possible to determine which of these profiles will occur a priori. This can only be obtained by increasing z n and noting what happens to the oxygen concentration profile. The results illustrate the care needed in using numerical solutions and the extra physical insight that may be gained from using analytical solutions where they are available.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.