Abstract

Appropriate glasses can improve visual functioning of children with Down syndrome (DS), but it is unknown if such interventions influence their cognitive impairments. In a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Children with DS (2–16 years) were provided either bifocal glasses (add +2.5 Dioptres; n = 50) or unifocal glasses (n = 52). Executive functions were assessed pre- and post-intervention with the task-based Minnesota Executive Function Scale (MEFS) and with questionnaires, BRIEF-P and BRIEF, parents’ and teachers’ version. Intervention effects and associations between executive functions, (near) vision and ocular alignment were analysed. Intervention improved MEFS-Total-scores in the bifocal group (p = 0.002; Cohen’s d = 0.60) but not in the unifocal group (p = 0.191; Cohen’s d = 0.24). Post-intervention, there was no intergroup difference (p = 0.120; Cohen’s d = 0.34). Post-intervention, higher MEFS-scores were associated with better visual acuities (crowded near p = 0.025; uncrowded near p = 0.019; distant p = 0.045). Pre-post changes in MEFS-scores correlated significantly with improved ocular alignment (p = 0.040). Exploratory analysis of the questionnaires showed improved teacher-rated BRIEF-scores in both groups (bifocals: p = 0.014, Cohen’s d = 1.91; unifocals: p = 0.022, Cohen’s d = 1.46), with no intergroup difference (p = 0.594; Cohen’s d = 0.23). These results demonstrate positive effects of wearing better-correcting glasses on executive functioning in children with DS, suggesting a link between their visual and executive functioning. However, the relative contributions of distant and near vision need further study.

Highlights

  • Appropriate glasses can improve visual functioning of children with Down syndrome (DS), but it is unknown if such interventions influence their cognitive impairments

  • Minnesota Executive Function Scale (MEFS) scores were missing for various reasons

  • We found a significant positive rank-correlation between change in ocular alignment and change in MEFS scores in the bifocal group (n = 36, rho = 0.343, p = 0.040), indicating that children with improved ocular alignment had improved in MEFS scores

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Appropriate glasses can improve visual functioning of children with Down syndrome (DS), but it is unknown if such interventions influence their cognitive impairments. Exploratory analysis of the questionnaires showed improved teacher-rated BRIEF-scores in both groups (bifocals: p = 0.014, Cohen’s d = 1.91; unifocals: p = 0.022, Cohen’s d = 1.46), with no intergroup difference (p = 0.594; Cohen’s d = 0.23) These results demonstrate positive effects of wearing better-correcting glasses on executive functioning in children with DS, suggesting a link between their visual and executive functioning. In children with DS, it is still unclear whether the visual impairments aggravate their lag in cognitive development If this relation exists, improving their visual acuity with optimal corrections in glasses tailored to the specific ocular disorders of children with DS could support cognitive development. Improving visual acuity with optimal corrections in glasses tailored to the specific ocular disorders of children with DS could be a first step to support their visuospatial working memory and their cognitive development. This investigation did not include a control group, and focused only on a small group of children with DS that were pre-selected for their ability to read and write

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.