Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of patients with diffuse coronary lesions treated with very long drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) (≥ 40mm) over a period of one year. MethodsThis single-center prospective study enrolled a total of 343 consecutive patients (376 long stents) who underwent percutaneous coronary stent implantation with very long DES. One year clinical outcomes were analyzed. A subgroup analysis of diabetic patients was also performed. ResultsOne year follow up data was available for 314 patients (91.5%). All-cause mortality was 5 (1.6%). Eleven (3.5%) patients had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Definite / probable stent thrombosis was reported in 7 (2.2%) patients. Over one year, 3 (1%) patients underwent target lesion revascularization (TLR). The total number of target lesion failure was 9 (2.9%). The rate of target lesion failure at one year was 2.6% using one vessel per patient analysis. Two patients had ischemic stroke. Any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was observed in 19 (6%) patients. The event rates between sirolimus and everolimus stent groups were compared - cardiac death (1.7% vs 1.5%; p=0.911), stent thrombosis (2.5% vs 1.7%; p=0.612), TLR (1% vs 0.8%; p=0.878), any MACE (7% vs 4.1%; p=0.284). Exertional dyspnea was reported by 47 (15%) patients at the end of one year. Dual antiplatelet adherence rate was 96% (n=301 of 314). ConclusionUse of very long stents (≥40mm) for diffuse coronary lesions is safe and effective with acceptably low event rates. No significant differences in event rates were observed between the types of DES used in this study (Sirolimus Vs. everolimus).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call