Abstract

We thank Norscia and Palagi for their insightful commentary on our article ‘Scratch that itch: revisiting links between self-directed behaviour and parasitological, social and environmental factors in a free-ranging primate’ [1]. We welcome such discussion because we think, as the authors themselves point out at the end of their commentary, that research needs to continue in this area. In general, we agree that different stressors may act at different time frames in triggering self-directed behaviours. As rightly pointed out by Norscia and Palagi, our analysis did not take into account the different time frames that would allow for separating the effects of acute and chronic stressors on self-directed behaviours. At the level of a behavioural observation of 15 min, we instead investigated whether the occurrence of scratching and self-grooming was linked to various factors such as lice load, social activities, neighbours in proximity and environmental conditions, together and/or separately. Our study was correlational and we, therefore, avoided claims of causality, although we did address potential causal mechanisms in the discussion. That said, we would nonetheless like to respond to several points made by Norscia and Palagi. First, one of the main points of our study was to highlight biases in the investigation of certain research hypotheses, such as those involving self-directed behaviours. Studies in primatology have often, if perhaps inadvertently, assumed that the primary drivers of self-directed behaviour (SDB) are social, with parasite or abiotic factors being secondary. Norscia and Palagi nonetheless state that ‘(…) the association between self-directed behaviours, and particularly scratching, with social, environmental and parasitological factors can be considered as more than just a hypothesis. Once established that the different factors are not alternative and that their relationship with scratching has been demonstrated, it is worth focusing on the role that each factor can have in …

Highlights

  • We thank Norscia and Palagi for their insightful commentary on our article ‘Scratch that itch: revisiting links between selfdirected behaviour and parasitological, social and environmental factors in a free-ranging primate’ [1]

  • As rightly pointed out by Norscia and Palagi, our analysis did not take into account the different time frames that would allow for separating the effects of acute and chronic stressors on self-directed behaviours

  • Once established that the different factors are not alternative and that their relationship with scratching has been demonstrated, it is worth focusing on the role that each factor can have in relation to the time scale’ (p. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We thank Norscia and Palagi for their insightful commentary on our article ‘Scratch that itch: revisiting links between selfdirected behaviour and parasitological, social and environmental factors in a free-ranging primate’ [1]. As rightly pointed out by Norscia and Palagi, our analysis did not take into account the different time frames that would allow for separating the effects of acute and chronic stressors on self-directed behaviours.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.