Abstract

BackgroundA retrospective study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of one-stage fibular impaction allografting and vascularized greater trochanter flap autografting for the treatment of bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).MethodsPatients who underwent one-stage aforementioned hip-preserving surgeries due to bilateral ONFH were retrospectively reviewed from January 2008 to December 2013. Sixty-nine patients (138 hips) with a mean age of 31.5 years and mean follow-up of 7.0 years were included. Hips that underwent fibular impaction allografting and vascularized greater trochanter flap autografting were assigned as group A and group B, respectively. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used for clinical evaluation, and a series of X-ray images were used for radiological assessment. For inter-group analysis, the paired t test was used for continuous data, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for non-parametric data, while the Mann-Whitney U test was used for intra-group analysis.ResultsThe HHS and VAS in both groups A and B had a substantial advancement when compared with the preoperative level (p < 0.01). Fibular impaction allografting can achieve more pain relief (p < 0.01), though no clinical difference was found in terms of minimal clinically important difference (MCID < 10 points). Group A showed better radiological results than group B (p = 0.04). It was discovered that the appropriate indication for each procedure was patients with Association for Research on Osseous Circulation (ARCO) stages II and III, respectively.ConclusionOne-stage hip-preserving surgeries for the management of bilateral ONFH could obtain good medium and long-term outcomes. It was recommended that fibular impaction allografting is more suitable for patients in ARCO stage II, while for patients in ARCO stage III, vascularized greater trochanter flap autografting is a better preference.Trial registrationRetrospectively registered.

Highlights

  • Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) mainly affects young individuals in their thirties and forties [1]

  • The Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in groups A and B improved from preoperative 70.7 ± 3.5 points, 58.1 ± 5.0 points, 4.8 ± 1.2 points, and 8.0 ± 1.9 points to postoperative 92.4 ± 4.0 points, 84.2 ± 5.8 points points, 1.1 ± 1.0 points, and 2.5 ± 1.9 points, respectively (Table 3). It revealed that postoperative HHS and VAS in both groups had a substantial advancement when compared with the preoperative level (p < 0.01)

  • Our findings proved that one-stage hip-preserving surgeries could be effective and safe, which could provide evidencebased complementary methods for the treatment of ONFH

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) mainly affects young individuals in their thirties and forties [1]. The terminal course of ONFH is femoral head collapse, articular cartilage degeneration, and subsequent latestage osteoarthritis when no timely treatment initiated [3, 4]. Regardless of improvements in joint prosthesis design, instruments, and surgical techniques, THA is unlikely to be endured for the rest of the life of the acceptors, especially for young individuals. It is of great significance to preserve the necrotic femoral head, especially for young patients. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of one-stage fibular impaction allografting and vascularized greater trochanter flap autografting for the treatment of bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call