Abstract

While the existence of mental illness has been documented for centuries, the understanding and treatment of such illnesses has evolved considerably over time. Ritual exorcisms and locking mentally ill patients in asylums have been fundamentally replaced by the use of psychotropic medications and evidence-based psychological practices. Yet the historic roots of mental health management and care has left a certain legacy. With regard to suicidal risk, the authors argue that suicidal patients are by definition seen as mentally ill and out of control, which demands hospitalization and the treatment of the mental disorder (often using a medication-only approach). Notably, however, the evidence for inpatient care and a medication-only approach for suicidal risk is either limited or totally lacking. Thus, a “one-size-fits-all” approach to treating suicidal risk needs to be re-considered in lieu of the evolving evidence base. To this end, the authors highlight a series of evidence-based considerations for suicide-focused clinical care, culminating in a stepped care public health model for optimal clinical care of suicidal risk that is cost-effective, least-restrictive, and evidence-based.

Highlights

  • Introduction to the ProblemSuicide is a major public health issue around the world that accounts for almost 800,000 deaths per year [1]

  • While suicidologists and public health officials are understandably preoccupied with suicide deaths and suicide attempts, Jobes and Joiner [3] have recently reflected on the massive population of people who experience suicidal ideation and all too often escape the attention of our suicide prevention research, clinical treatments, and even national health care policies

  • “National stepped care model provides a way of thinking broadly to providing cost-effective, least-restrictive, Mental Health Service Corps” that could create a large community of volunteers and provide caring individuals who could serve in a range of capacities, such as screening and peer-based support with proper training and supervision [82]

Read more

Summary

Introduction to the Problem

Suicide is a major public health issue around the world that accounts for almost 800,000 deaths per year [1]. In the United States suicide is the 10th leading cause of death with approximately 47,000 total deaths in 2017 and 1.4 million American adults attempted suicide in that same year [2]. While suicidologists and public health officials are understandably preoccupied with suicide deaths and suicide attempts, Jobes and Joiner [3] have recently reflected on the massive population of people who experience suicidal ideation and all too often escape the attention of our suicide prevention research, clinical treatments, and even national health care policies. In the United States, 10,600,000 American adults experience serious suicidal thoughts [4]—a worrisome cohort which dwarfs the populations of those who attempt and die by suicide.

History of Mental Health and Suicidal Patients
Psychopharmacology for Suicidal Risk
Legacy of Mental Health
A Fixed Mindset about Suicidal Patient Care?
Key Developments That May Be Changing Our Mindset
Stabilization Planning
Caring Contact Follow Up
Lived Experience Perspective
Suicide-Specific Policy Developments
Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alerts
Zero Suicide
Recommended Standard Care
The Pursuit of Suicidal Typologies
Effective Clinical Treatments for Suicidal Risk
Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Cognitive Therapy for Suicide Prevention
Brief Cognitive Behavior Therapy
The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality
A Stepped Care Public Health Model
Suicidal People Who Do Not Seek Mental Health Care
Matching Different Treatments to Different Suicidal People
Findings
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call