Abstract

Null measurements formed a considerable fraction of the scientific work of Howard Malmstadt. He worked extensively to automate and perfect titration methods and he applied the titration process to potentiometric and spectrometric methods in a technique he called isomation. Further, a great deal of his work in automation took advantage of devices based on null principles. Null measurement and control systems directly compare the measured quantity with that of a standard which is then adjusted until the difference between the standard and measured quantities is zero. The output number (with units) is obtained from the setting of the standard. Direct measurement systems use conversion devices to convert the information from the measured quantity to a related number. Direct measurements require calibration to obtain the conversion factor and units while null measurements are calibrated inherently. Most modern measurement systems employ null devices, but as conversion devices in direct measurement systems rather than as part of a “full” null system. There are advantages to be gained through a reconsideration of complete null measurement approach advanced so effectively by Howard Malmstadt.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.