One Nation, One Election In Federal Democracies: A Comparative Study Of Global Experiences

Abstract

The concept of "One Nation, One Election" has garnered significant attention and debate in recent years, especially within the framework of federal democracies. This research paper conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of the global experiences surrounding the implementation or discussion of synchronized elections in countries with federal systems of governance. The primary objective of this study is to examine the practicality, challenges, and implications of harmonizing electoral cycles at various levels of government in federal democracies. It delves into the political, constitutional, and logistical considerations that influence the decision to pursue such electoral reforms. By focusing on a diverse set of countries, including India, the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, and South Africa, this research aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the concept's feasibility and impact in distinct federal contexts. The paper explores the historical development and current status of discussions or implementations related to "One Nation, One Election" in each country, taking into account the unique features of their federal systems. It assesses the potential benefits of synchronized elections, such as cost reduction and improved policy continuity, while also considering the potential drawbacks and concerns related to voter fatigue, constitutional constraints, and political strategies.