Abstract
The problem of Pegg–Barnett's phase operator remains actual. We show that the physically absurd state obtained in our recent paper [Yu.I. Vorontsov, Yu.A. Rembovsky, Phys. Lett. A 254 (1999) 7] results from the phase formalism itself and not from an `unphysical choice of approximate phase measurement'.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
