Abstract

The surging trend of (re)emerging diseases urges for the early detection, prevention, and control of zoonotic infections through the One Health (OH) approach. The operationalization of the OH approach depends on the contextual setting, the presence of the actors across the domains of OH, and the extent of their involvement. In the absence of national operational guidelines for OH in India, this study aims to identify potential actors with an attempt to understand the current health system network strength (during an outbreak and non-outbreak situations) at the local health system of Ahmedabad, India. This case study adopted a sequential mixed methods design conducted in two phases. First, potential actors who have been involved directly or indirectly in zoonoses prevention and control were identified through in-depth interviews. A network study was conducted as part of the second phase through a structured network questionnaire. Interest and influence matrix, average degree, network density, and degree of centralization were calculated through Atlas.Ti (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany), UCINET (Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KY, USA) software. The identified actors were categorized based on power, administrative level (either at the city or district level), and their level of action: administrative (policy planners, managers), providers (physicians, veterinarians), and community (health workers, community leaders). The matrix indicated that administrative actors from the district level were ‘context setters’ and the actors from the city level were either ‘players’ or ‘subjects’. The network density showed a strength of 0.328 during the last outbreak of H5N1, which decreased to 0.163 during the non-outbreak situation. Overall, there was low collaboration observed in this study, which ranged from communication (during non-outbreaks) to coordination (during outbreaks). The private and non-governmental actors were not integrated into collaborative activities. This study concludes that not only collaboration is needed for OH among the sectors pertaining to the human and the animal health system but also better structured (‘inter-level’) collaboration across the governance levels for effective implementation.

Highlights

  • The interaction of humans and animals in their shared environment results in dynamic circumstances in which the health of all is inextricably linked to that of the others [1,2]

  • The policymakers, program managers, and planners were considered as ‘administrative actors’, followed by the actors involved in the clinical service provision such as physicians and veterinarians, considered as ‘provider actors’

  • The analysis revealed that the administrative level held the highest power of influence for zoonoses prevention activities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interaction of humans and animals in their shared environment results in dynamic circumstances in which the health of all is inextricably linked to that of the others [1,2]. The One Health (OH) approach and its strategies are promoting collaborative actions at the human-animal-environment interface [5,6,7,8], providing opportunities for the prevention and management of zoonoses and guiding zoonoses research and policy. In the case of unforeseeable onset and rapid (re)emergence of zoonotic diseases, the public health system should quickly be able to identify the early signs and react promptly to minimize the threats [11]. This type of situation is the time to embrace an OH approach as a framework for public health action against zoonoses, as indicated by the tripartite (WHO, FAO, OIE) zoonotic guide [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call