Abstract

The goal of this review is twofold: first to explore whether mutual exclusivity and functional fixedness overlap and what might be their respective specificities and second, to investigate whether mutual exclusivity as an inferential principle could be applied in other domains than language and whether it can be found in non-human species. In order to do that, we first give an overview of the representative studies of each phenomenon. We then analyze papers on tool use learning in children that studied or observed one of these phenomena. We argue that, despite their common principle -one tool one function- mutual exclusivity and functional fixedness are two distinct phenomena and need to be addressed separately in order to fully understand the mechanisms underlying social learning and cognition. In addition, mutual exclusivity appears to be applicable in other domains than language learning, namely tool use learning and is also found in non-human species when learning symbols and tools.

Highlights

  • Learning and cultural transmission is a prominent topic of research, involving a large range of species, from humans to different groups of non-human animals

  • The main aims of this review are to see (1) whether mutual exclusivity and functional fixedness overlap and what might be their respective specificities and (2) whether mutual exclusivity as an inferential principle could be applied in other domains than language and whether it can be found in nonhuman species

  • The first aim of this review was to explore whether mutual exclusivity and functional fixedness overlap and what might be their respective specificities

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Learning and cultural transmission is a prominent topic of research, involving a large range of species, from humans to different groups of non-human animals. Social learning is assumed to be especially important for young and/or novice individuals as they are confronted with an environment that is constantly changing, and they have to adapt quickly by learning new skills where following an expert conspecific offers a shortcut strategy (Hoppitt and Laland, 2013; van der Post et al, 2016). It is energy- and time-saving, which is not the case for individual learning which presents risks of predation (Galef and Laland, 2005; Hoppitt and Laland, 2013). Social learning research predominantly has focused on the forms of learning from conspecifics

One Function One Tool?
MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY IN PSYCHOLOGY
MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY AND FUNCTIONAL FIXEDNESS IN TOOL USE IN HUMANS
AN EVOLUTIONARY VIEW OF MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY AND FUNCTIONAL FIXEDNESS
CONCLUSION
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call