Onderhoud met Edwin Arrison

Helené Van Tonder

doi:10.4314/actat.v35i2.1

Abstract

The thirtieth anniversary of the Kairos document in 2015 served as a stimulus for various events reflecting on this historical document and subsequent movement. Among these were the Kairos 30 conference (Johannesburg on 17-20 August) and a colloquium which reflected on the theme “The challenge of prophetic theology for theology today” (Volmoed, Hermanus, 27-29 September). This interview was conducted in the aftermath of these events with Edwin Arrison. He is the General Secretary of Kairos Southern Africa, a minister of the Anglican Church, and chairperson of the Centre for Christian Spirituality in Cape Town.

Highlights

The thirtieth anniversary of the Kairos document in 2015 served as a stimulus for various events reflecting on this historical document and subsequent movement. Among these were the Kairos 30 conference (Johannesburg on 17-20 August) and a colloquium which reflected on the theme “The challenge of prophetic theology for theology today” (Volmoed, Hermanus, 27-29 September). This interview was conducted in the aftermath of these events with Edwin Arrison
Destyds was daar baie van hierdie tipe kollokwiums, so ons het ’n black theology kollokwium gehad by Koinonia tussen Pietermaritzburg en Durban
Ek kan onthou die Sunday Times het ’n volblad, dink ek, reaksie gehad van aartsbiskop Philip Russell en biskop Peter Storey

Summary

Introduction

The thirtieth anniversary of the Kairos document in 2015 served as a stimulus for various events reflecting on this historical document and subsequent movement. Die dertigste herdenking van die Kairosdokument in 2015 het gedien as stimulus vir verskeie geleenthede waartydens gereflek teer is op hierdie historiese dokument en die beweging wat daaruit ontstaan het. Die Kairos 30 konferensie (Johannesburg, 17-20 Augustus) is ’n voorbeeld van so ’n geleentheid, asook ’n kollokwium (Volmoed, Hermanus, 27-29 September) wat reflekteer het op die tema “Die uitdaging van profetiese teologie vir teologie vandag.”

Results

Conclusion