Oncological control in high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy plus primary hormone therapy

Abstract

IntroductionIn patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRPCa), multimodal treatment plays a fundamental role. ObjectiveTo compare relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with HRPCa, treated primarily with radiotherapy (RT)+hormone therapy (HT) versus radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage RT (sRT)±HT when biochemical recurrence (BCR) appears. Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of 226 patients with HRPCa (1996–2008), treated primarily with RT+HT (n=137) or RP (n=89). The Kaplan–Meier method has been used to evaluate survival and the log-rank test has been used to evaluate the contrast between the different categories of the variables. Multivariate analysis has been performed using Cox regression to determine variables with an impact on RFS with statistical significance (p<0.05). ResultsThe median follow-up of the series was 111 (IQR 85–137.5) months. After RT+HT, 32 (23.4%) patients relapsed, and after RP 41 (46.1%) cases, (p=0.0001). When comparing the primary treatments, the RFS at 5 and 10 years was higher after RT+HT versus RP in monotherapy (p=0.001). The primary treatment with RT+HT reduced the risk of BCR when compared to the RP (HR=0.41, p=0.002). The estimation of the RFS at 5 and 10 years after RP+sRT±HT was 89.7 and 87.1%, while after primary RT+HT was 91.6 and 71.1%, respectively (p=0.01). The only factor that behaved as an independent predictor of RFS was the multimodal treatment with RP+sRT±HT when BCR showed up (HR=2.39, p=0.01). ConclusionIn HRPCa, multimodal treatment with RP+sRT±HT if BCR, significantly improves RFS with respect to treatment with RT+HT.