Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for radiologically aggressive small-sized lung cancer.

Abstract

8525 Background: Despite increasing evidence of favorable outcomes after segmentectomy for indolent lung cancer, such as ground glass opacity-dominant tumors, the adaptation of segmentectomy for radiologically aggressive lung cancer remains controversial. We attempted to elucidate oncologic outcomes after segmentectomy for radiologically aggressive lung cancer. Methods: Data from a multicenter database of 1353 patients with completely resected clinical Stage IA1–IA2 lung cancer at three institutions were retrospectively analyzed to identify radiologically aggressive lung cancer and compare outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in patients with radiologically aggressive lung cancer using propensity score matching. Results: Multivariable analysis showed that consolidation to maximum tumor (C/T) ratio on preoperative high-resolution computed tomography ( P= 0.037) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( P= 0.029) were independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). The criteria for radiologically aggressive lung cancer were determined as C/T ratio ≥ 0.8 or SUVmax ≥ 2.5, for which 522 patients were identified. RFS and overall survival (OS) were significantly worse in patients with aggressive lung cancer (5-year RFS, 83.3%; 5-year OS, 89.4%) than in those without the same (5-year RFS, 97.0%; P< 0.0001; 5-year OS, 97.3%; P< 0.0001). Among patients with aggressive lung cancer, no significant difference in RFS and OS was found between those undergoing lobectomy (n = 392) (5-year RFS, 81.3%; 5-year OS, 88.3%) and segmentectomy (n = 130) (5-year RFS, 90.0%; P= 0.33; 5-year OS, 92.3%; P= 0.76). Among the 111 pairs propensity matched for age, sex, smoking history, solid tumor size, C/T ratio, SUVmax, tumor location, clinical stage, and histology, similar RFS and OS were found between those undergoing lobectomy (5-year RFS, 83.3%; 5-year OS, 88.3%) and segmentectomy (5-year RFS, 90.9%; P= 0.92; 5-year OS, 94.5%). Conclusions: For radiologically aggressive small-sized lung cancer, oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy were equivalent to those of lobectomy.