Abstract

Following a long-standing historiographical tradition, the article examines one of the most controversial and ambiguous characters in Russian history — Emperor Paul I, who was caught in between two epochs — the 18th classic “noble” century and the autocratic-bureaucratic 19th century. The authors summarize the arguments confirming that for all its deep inconsistency, sometimes reaching the point of flippancy, he personified both a close continuity with the past and a distinct evolution of Russia's political institutions towards solidifying the absolutist pattern. In an attempt to carry out appropriate reforms, Paul took a too hasty pace, to which the ruling elite responded with deaf resistance, which eventually resulted in a palace coup.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.