OnabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity in children.

Abstract

AimsThis study evaluated whether one (or more) of three doses of onabotulinumtoxinA were safe and effective to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children.MethodsThis was a 48‐week prospective, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study in children (aged 5–17 years) with NDO and urinary incontinence (UI) receiving one onabotulinumtoxinA treatment (50, 100, or 200 U; not to exceed 6 U/kg). Primary endpoint: change from baseline in daytime UI episodes. Secondary endpoints: change from baseline in urine volume at first morning catheterization, urodynamic measures, and positive response on the treatment benefit scale. Safety was also assessed.ResultsThere was a similar reduction in urinary incontinence from baseline to Week 6 for all doses (−1.3 episodes/day). Most patients reported positive responses on the treatment benefit scale (75.0%−80.5%). From baseline to Week 6, increases were observed in urine volume at first morning clean intermittent catheterization (50 U, 21.9 ml; 100 U, 34.9 ml; 200 U, 87.5 ml; p = 0.0055, 200 U vs. 50 U) and in maximum cystometric capacity (range 48.6−63.6 ml) and decreases in maximum detrusor pressure during the storage phase (50 U, −12.9; 100 U, −20.1; 200 U, −27.3 cmH2O; p = 0.0157, 200 U vs. 50 U). The proportion of patients experiencing involuntary detrusor contractions dropped from baseline (50 U, 94.4%; 100 U, 88.1%; 200 U, 92.6%) to Week 6 (50 U, 61.8%; 100 U, 44.7%; 200 U, 46.4%). Safety was similar across doses; urinary tract infection was most frequent.ConclusionsOnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of NDO in children; 200 U showed greater efficacy in reducing bladder pressure and increasing bladder capacity.