Abstract
The statement used in proving Theorem 2 of [1] needs explanation. This was pointed out to us by Professor S. Raghwan of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, and we gave the explanation of this in [2]. For the sake of completeness we give here the full proof of the theorem; filling the gap in the proof. We use the same notations and definitions as those of [1]. Also for simplicity of notation we write kmn, gmn and amn to mean km,n, gm,n and a respectively. We need the following lemma.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
