On Variability of Authors’ Style under the Influence of the Socio-Cultural Environment in the Context of Dialogue of Natural Scientific and Humanitarian Cultures

Svetlana Nikolaevna Dvoryatkina,Anjelica Aleksandrovna Dyakina

doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s4p167

Abstract

The article covers the problem of dialogue between the humanitarian and natural scientific cultures in solving crucial interdisciplinary issues relating to the study of variability of authors’ styles under the influence of socio-cultural conditions. The introduction highlights the problem of the study of the author’s style variability based on the dialogues of culture, its methodological principles. The principal refrain is as follows: a combination of different ways of reality cognition, including rational natural scientific and irrational humanitarian contributes to the preservation of national identity, original traditions, language, customs and spiritual and moral values of the Russian people, the basics of cultural variety in the era of globalization. The main part of the research determines the role of the dialogue of cultures in obtaining quantitative and qualitative conclusions in literature studies regarding text evaluation for stylistic identification and determination of the authorship authenticity in disputable cases; the hypothesis for the research has been suggested covering the possibility of the author’s style variability under the influence of the socio-cultural environment; socio-cultural conditions for the variability of the author’s style have been developed; theoretical aspects of the literary text attribution problem have been analyzed; the spectrum of the developed multilateral linguistic model and the parameters of the analyzed text have been expanded, the importance of the model has been proved; the position of the authors of the research has been justified highlighting the need to apply the aggregate of mathematic methods for the statistic accuracy in identifying the author’s style and the development of an integrative mathematic model based on modern computer technologies. The conclusion suggests presumable findings and perspectives related to the heuristic potential of the interrelation of the natural scientific and humanitarian sciences in solving inter-disciplinary problems of the authors’ styles variability under the influence of a socio-cultural potential for the interrelation of natural scientific and humanitarian sciences in solving inter-disciplinary problems of the authors’ style variability under the influence of a socio-cultural environment. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s4p167

Highlights

The era of the global culture formation and the inter-cultural dialogue development preconditions a weighted and constructive approach to the solution of tasks that Russia and the global community need to implement in the 21st century, i.e. integration of science and culture, technical and humanitarian knowledge, combination of modern achievements of the technical progress with the basic spiritual and moral values
Bakhtin developed the methodology of the dialogue of cultures
We assume that we have quite long fragments T=t1t2...tl of prose works by the same author in Russian written in different periods of his/her life

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Introduce the ProblemThe era of the global culture formation and the inter-cultural dialogue development preconditions a weighted and constructive approach to the solution of tasks that Russia and the global community need to implement in the 21st century, i.e. integration of science and culture, technical and humanitarian knowledge, combination of modern achievements of the technical progress with the basic spiritual and moral values. Today’s world should rely on the integral systematic knowledge ale to perceive a dialogue of different cultures and communication of their bearers. M.M. Bakhtin developed the methodology of the dialogue of cultures. Bakhtin developed the methodology of the dialogue of cultures He wrote that “A dialogue is always a development and cooperation. It is always a union, not a breakdown. A dialogue is not a means; it is a goal in itself. To exist means to communicate with the help of a dialogue. A dialogue cannot and should not stop (Bakhtin, 1972). While analyzing the problem of a “dialogue between Me and Other”, M.M. Bakhtin developed a theory of a “dialogue of cultures”. Ability of one culture to master the achievements of the other is one of the sources of its existence

Methods

Results

Conclusion