Abstract

AbstractTurbulence plays a key role in many oceanic processes, but a shortage of turbulence observations impedes its exploration. Parameterizations of turbulence applied to readily-available CTD data can be useful in expanding our understanding of the space-time variability of turbulence. Typically tested and applied to shipboard data, these parameterizations have not been rigorously tested on data collected by underwater gliders, which show potential to observe turbulence in conditions that ships cannot. Using data from a 10-day glider survey in a coastal shelf environment, we compare estimates of turbulent dissipation from the finescale parameterization and Thorpe scale method to those estimated from microstructure observations collected on the same glider platform. We find that the finescale parameterization captures the magnitude and statistical distribution of dissipation, but cannot resolve spatiotemporal features in this relatively shallow water depth. In contrast, the Thorpe scale method more successfully characterizes the spatiotemporal distribution of turbulence; however, the magnitude of dissipation is overestimated, largely due to limitations on the detectable density overturn size imposed by the typical glider CTD sampling frequency of 0.5 Hz and CTD noise. Despite these limitations, turbulence parameterizations provide a viable opportunity to use CTD data collected by the multitude of gliders sampling the ocean to develop greater insight into the space-time variability of ocean turbulence and the role of turbulence in oceanic processes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call