On Transforming to Eliminate Clusters

Abstract

Geographical AnalysisVolume 4, Issue 4 p. 424-427 Free Access On Transforming to Eliminate Clusters Geoffrey Robinson, Geoffrey Robinson Geoffrey Robinson and Malcolm H. Mathias are both associated with the department of geography, Monash University, MelbourneSearch for more papers by this authorMalcolm H. Mathias, Malcolm H. Mathias Geoffrey Robinson and Malcolm H. Mathias are both associated with the department of geography, Monash University, MelbourneSearch for more papers by this author Geoffrey Robinson, Geoffrey Robinson Geoffrey Robinson and Malcolm H. Mathias are both associated with the department of geography, Monash University, MelbourneSearch for more papers by this authorMalcolm H. Mathias, Malcolm H. Mathias Geoffrey Robinson and Malcolm H. Mathias are both associated with the department of geography, Monash University, MelbourneSearch for more papers by this author First published: October 1972 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1972.tb00487.xCitations: 4 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat LITERATURE CITED 1 Dodd, J. R., J. A. Cain, and J. E. Bugh. Apparently Significant Contour Patterns Demonstrated with Random Data,” Journal of Geological Education, 13 (1965), 109– 114. 2 Baird, A. K., K. W. Baird and D. M. Morton. On Deciding Whether Trend Surfaces of Progressively Higher Order Are Meaningful: Discussion,” Bulletin, Geological Society of America, 82 (1971), 1219– 34. 3 Fairbairn, K. J. and G. Robinson. Towns and Trend Surfaces in Gippsland, Victoria,” Australian Geographical Studies, 5 (1967), 125– 34. 4 Gould, P. Is Statistix Inferens the Geographical Name for a Wild Goose? Economic Geography, 46 (1970), (Supplement), 439– 48. 5 Howarth, R. J. Trend Surface Fitting to Random Data—An Experimental Test,” American Journal of Science, 265 (1967), 619– 25. 6 Merriam, D. F. and J. W. Harbaugh. Trend Surface Analysis of Regional and Residual Components of Geologic Structure in Kansas,” Kansas Geological Survey Computer Contributions, 11 (1964). 7 Norcliffe, G. B. On the Use and Limitations of Trend Surface Models,” Canadian Geographer, 13 (1969), 338– 48. 8 Peterson, J. A. and G. Robinson. Trend Surface Mapping of Cirque Floor Levels,” Nature, 222 (1969), 75– 76. 9 Robinson, G. Some Comments on Trend-Surface Analysis,” Area, 3 (1970), 31– 36. 10 Robinson, G. Trials on Trends through Clusters of Cirques,” Area, 4 (1972), 104– 13. 11 Robinson, G. and K. J. Fairbairn. An Application of Trend-Surface Mapping to the Distribution of Residuals from a Regression,” Annals, Association of American Geographers, 59 (1969), 158– 70. 12 Robinson, G., J. A. Peterson and P. M. Anderson. Trend Surface Analysis of Corrie Altitudes in Scotland,” Scottish Geographical Magazine, 87 (1971), 142– 46. 13 Tinkler, K. J. Trend Surfaces with ‘Low Explanations’; the Assessment of Their Significance,” American Journal of Science, 167 (1969), 114– 23. 14 Unwin, D. J. Percentage RSS in Trend Surface Analysis, Area, 1 (1970), 25– 28. Citing Literature Volume4, Issue4October 1972Pages 424-427 ReferencesRelatedInformation