Abstract

Two vertices in a graph are said to 2-step dominate each other if they are at distance 2 apart. A set S of vertices in a graph G is a hop dominating set of G if every vertex outside S is 2-step dominated by some vertex of S. The hop domination number, $$\gamma _{h}(G)$$, of G is the minimum cardinality of a hop dominating set of G. A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex in G is adjacent to at least one vertex of S. The total domination number, $$\gamma _{t}(G)$$, of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. It is known that if G is a triangle-free graph, then $$\gamma _{h}(G)\le \gamma _{t}(G)$$. But there are connected graphs G for which the difference $$\gamma _{h}(G)-\gamma _{t}(G)$$ can be made arbitrarily large. It would be interesting to find other classes of graphs G that satisfy $$\gamma _{h}(G)\le \gamma _{t}(G)$$. In this paper, we study the relationship between total domination number and hop domination number in diamond-free graph. We prove that if G is diamond-free graph of order n with the exception of two special graphs, then $$\gamma _{h}(G)- \gamma _{t}(G)\le \frac{n}{6}$$. Furthermore, we find two subclasses of diamond-free graphs G that satisfy $$\gamma _{h}(G)\le \gamma _{t}(G)$$ and generalize the known result.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.