Abstract
The Wagner hypothesis has been widely accepted in the buckling analysis of thin-walled members. Recently, the validity of Wagner hypothesis has been questioned by Ojalvo based on the theorem of minimum potential energy following the method used by Bleich. Since then, efforts have been made by several investigators to settle the dispute on the validity of Wagner hypothesis, but no general agreement has yet been reached. The purpose of this paper is to show more clearly the validity of Wagner hypothesis using the same method as adopted by Ojalvo. In this way, we show the difference between the two formulations and point out more precisely why Ojalvo's theories are incorrect.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
