Abstract

The Multiple-Network Poroelastic Theory (MPET) is a numerical model to characterize the transport of multiple fluid networks in the brain, which overcomes the problem of conducting separate analyses on individual fluid compartments and losing the interactions between tissue and fluids, in addition to the interaction between the different fluids themselves. In this paper, the blood perfusion results from MPET modeling are partially validated using cerebral blood flow (CBF) data obtained from arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which uses arterial blood water as an endogenous tracer to measure CBF. Two subjects—one healthy control and one patient with unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis are included in the validation test. The comparison shows several similarities between CBF data from ASL and blood perfusion results from MPET modeling, such as higher blood perfusion in the gray matter than in the white matter, higher perfusion in the periventricular region for both the healthy control and the patient, and asymmetric distribution of blood perfusion for the patient. Although the partial validation is mainly conducted in a qualitative way, it is one important step toward the full validation of the MPET model, which has the potential to be used as a testing bed for hypotheses and new theories in neuroscience research.

Highlights

  • Computational modeling has shown great potential in biomedical engineering research

  • The numerical results of blood perfusion are compared with cerebral blood flow (CBF) data obtained from arterial spin labeling (ASL) images, and similarities and differences are discussed

  • The 4-Multiple-Network Poroelastic Theory (MPET) model used for numerical simulations can output a wide range of results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Computational modeling has shown great potential in biomedical engineering research. Many software suites have been developed for mechanistic modeling of biological systems, such as SfePy (Rohan and Cimrman, 2012), FEBio (Maas et al, 2012), and FEniCS (Logg et al, 2012). In this respect, one of the promising tools is applying the multiple-porosity/multiplepermeability poroelastic model for modeling of fluid transport and tissue deformation in the brain, which is called the Multiple-network PoroElastic Theory (MPET). The number of fluid networks can be customized to specific research.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.