Abstract

This paper explores the relative use of performance explanations in terms of the internal logic of the financial accounting model, relating (intermediary) accounting effects and categories (accounting explanations) in annual report narratives. Different communicative aspects of accounting explanations are discussed and lead us to qualify accounting explanations as implicitly defensive in nature. The notion of accounting bias, as a tendency to explain negative performances more in technical accounting terms and positive performances more in strict cause-effect terminology, is introduced. The empirical study examines the presence of accounting bias in annual reports and investigates, from an impression management perspective, the impact of three organizational factors (public exposure, short-term profitability, stability of performances) on the use of accounting explanations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.