Abstract
For the analysis of survey-weighted categorical data, one recommended method of analysis is a log-rate model. For each cell in a contingency table, the survey weights are averaged across subjects and incorporated into an offset for a loglinear model. Supposedly, one can then proceed with the analysis of unweighted observed cell counts. We provide theoretical and simulation-based evidence to show that the log-rate analysis is not an effective statistical analysis method and should not be used in general. The root of the problem is in its failure to properly account for variability in the individual weights within cells of a contingency table. This results in goodness-of-fit tests that have higher-than-nominal error rates and confidence intervals for odds ratios that have lower-than-nominal coverage.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
