Abstract
AbstractActuarial fairness pertains to the situation in which the price of an insurance contract is equal to its expected outcome. We show that actuarial fairness leads to “unfairness” in that annuitants with higher survival rates can choose a better payoff in the sense of second-order stochastic dominance than those with lower survival rates. To deal with this issue, we propose equal utility pricing, i.e., we determine prices such that all contracts have the same (nonlinear) utility from the viewpoint of a third party (e.g., a social planner). This approach is of particular relevance with respect to the design of group self-annuitization schemes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
