Abstract

In this work we present a new subtraction method for next-to-leading order calculations that is particularly convenient even when narrow resonances are present. The method is particularly suitable for the implementation of next-to-leading order calculations matched to parton shower generators. It allows at the same time for the inclusion of all finite width effects, including interferences, and for a consistent treatment of resonances in the shower approach, preserving the mass of resonances near their peak. We implement our method, in a fully general and automatic way, within the POWHEG BOX framework, and illustrate it using as a test case the process of $p p \to \mu^+ \nu_\mu j_b j$, that is dominated by $t$-channel single top production.

Highlights

  • Where ΦB stands for the Born phase space and ΦR is the real emission phase space

  • In this work we present a new subtraction method for next-to-leading order calculations that is convenient even when narrow resonances are present

  • We must ascribe the differences that we find to the different treatment of radiation in POWHEG and Pythia8

Read more

Summary

Subtraction method

One introduces a parametrization of the real phase space of the form ΦR = ΦR(ΦB, Φrad), with dΦR = dΦBdΦrad,. Collinear and soft divergences cancel under the integral sign in the square bracket of the second term. The development of the subtraction method started since the very early QCD computations, already appearing in the bud in the calculation of the Drell-Yan process of ref. The subtraction method implemented in parton level generators was applied for processes initiated by hadrons [4], and it became common practice to compute the Rs term by using the collinear and the soft approximations in d dimensions (see for example [5]). [7], known as the FKS method, is instead based upon the more traditional phase space parametrizations used in refs. The formulation given in ref. [7], known as the FKS method, is instead based upon the more traditional phase space parametrizations used in refs. [2] and [4]

The subtraction method and resonances
The method
Implementation of the Born resonance histories in the POWHEG BOX
The real resonance histories and singular regions
Soft-collinear contributions
Soft terms
Collinear terms
Soft mismatch: dξ dy
Soft log Γ terms
Code organization
Test at the NLO level
Results and comparisons at the full shower level
Phenomenological analysis
RES-AR and ST-tch comparison
RES-AR and RES-HR comparison
NORES and RES-HR comparison
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call