Abstract

An important source of performance for active managers is industry weighting, yet this is neglected by the performance evaluation literature. Most market timing studies are conducted at a broad level, assessing exposure to equities as an asset class. This paper investigates the ability of US equity fund managers to time industry performance. The results indicate that, as a group, the funds exhibit no timing skills, with positive timing as frequent as negative timing. There is a subset of funds however, that appear to have strong forecasting abilities, correctly timing industries that are otherwise poorly timed by most fund managers. General timing ability is weakest in the Finance, Cyclical Services and Information Technology industries, while Consumer Goods industries show the best timing results.

Highlights

  • Market timing relies on accurate forecasting of the relative performance of asset classes and adjusting asset allocation to exploit the prediction

  • A very important fund management activity is a strategy of adjusting industry exposure based on outlook for industry conditions, yet performance evaluation in the academic literature has ignored this

  • We find that negative industry timing occurs as frequently and positive industry timing at a five-percent significance level, where the thirty-six percent of funds is split approximately evenly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

“Some favorable industry positioning played a role in the fund's success (over the period). As illustrated by the quote of the manager of the largest actively managed funds in the United States, Fidelity Magellan, industry exposure is an important factor. This observation is typical of comments made by fund managers in discussing performance and assessing strategy. After underweighting energy versus the index during the first half of the period, I increased the fund's exposure to a significant overweighting during the summer months. Another change I made was raising the fund's weighting in reinsurance stocks.

Background
Data and methodology
Results and interpretation
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.