Abstract

Timing control mechanisms were investigated in a complex rhythmic tapping task. Subjects performed a syncopated polyrhythm that consisted of two conflicting pulse trains (e. g., three elements per pattern repetition versus four elements per pattern repetition). The correlations between adjacent interval durations were found to differ systematically with the tempo at which the polyrhythm was performed. Only at fast tempos were subjects able to simultaneously control two different pulse trains. Alternative models are proposed that differ in their assumptions about the underlying pulse train. A comparison of the models suggests that the underlying pulse train is the faster one.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.