Abstract

In this work, an exact Euler solution is derived under the fundamental contingencies of axisymmetric, steady, rotational, incompressible, single-phase, non-reactive and inviscid fluid, which also stand behind the ubiquitously used mean flow profile named ‘Taylor–Culick.’ In comparison with the latter, which proves to be complex lamellar, the present model is derived in the context of a Trkalian flow field, and hence is capable of generating a non-zero swirl component that increases linearly in the streamwise direction. This enables us to provide an essential mathematical representation that is appropriate for flow configurations where the bulk gaseous motion is driven to swirl. From a procedural standpoint, the new Trkalian solution is deduced directly from the Bragg–Hawthorne equation, which has been repeatedly shown to possess sufficient latitude to reproduce several existing profiles such as Taylor–Culick’s as special cases. Throughout this study, the fundamental properties of the present model are considered and discussed in the light of existing flow approximations. Consistent with the original Taylor–Culick mean flow motion, the Trkalian velocity is seen to exhibit both axial and tangential components that increase linearly with the distance from the headwall, and a radial component that remains axially invariant. Furthermore, the Trkalian model is shown to form a subset of the Beltramian class of solutions for which the velocity and vorticity vectors are not only parallel but also directly proportional. This characteristic feature is interesting, as it stands in sharp contrast to the complex-lamellar nature of the Taylor–Culick motion, where the velocity and vorticity vectors remain orthogonal. By way of verification, a numerical simulation is carried out using a finite-volume solver, thus leading to a favourable agreement between theoretical and numerical predictions.

Highlights

  • The inviscid Taylor–Culick profile has long been viewed as a suitable approximation for the internal flow field in solid rocket motors (SRMs)

  • An Euler solution is presented as a prospective flow candidate for describing the internal gaseous motion in uniquely spinning rocket motors with either a similarity-conforming headwall injection profile or a sealed headwall

  • The Bragg–Hawthorne equation (BHE) in cylindrical coordinates is used to establish a steady-state model for solid and hybrid motors, where the hybrid configuration may be characterized by a large headwall-to-sidewall injection ratio

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The inviscid Taylor–Culick profile has long been viewed as a suitable approximation for the internal flow field in solid rocket motors (SRMs). These start with the classical laboratory measurements acquired by Taylor (1956) and evolve through a plethora of computational (Dunlap, Willoughby & Hermsen 1974; Baum, Levine & Lovine 1988; Sabnis, Gibeling & McDonald 1989; Apte & Yang 2000), experimental (Yamada et al 1976; Dunlap et al 1990; Casalis et al 1998; Avalon & Josset 2006) and theoretical studies (Clayton 1996; Barron, Van Moorhem & Majdalani 2000; Majdalani & Roh 2000; Majdalani & Van Moorhem 2001; Zhou & Majdalani 2002) for both cylindrically shaped and planar rocket configurations Most of these endeavours tend to confirm the suitability of the TC model in approximating the bulk flow in a simulated SRM (Kuentzmann 1991), many seem to recognize the natural tendency of the flow to develop a non-zero swirl component, and, axial vorticity, in a sufficiently long chamber with circular cross-section (Dunlap et al 1990; Balachandar et al 2001; Najjar et al 2006). In comparison to the original TC streamfunction, which is sinusoidal in nature, the new model leads to a Bessel function representation that will be systematically examined and discussed

Geometric configuration
Equations and boundary conditions
Normalization
Traditional TC technique
Bragg–Hawthorne technique
Bragg–Hawthorne representation
General and partial solutions
Flow properties
Comparison with the TC and Hart–McClure mean flows
Numerical verification
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call