Abstract
We compare the performance of 1126 US mutual funds deemed socially responsible to that of a matching sample of conventional funds over the three-decade period January 1980–December 2019. The comparisons are made over the entire period as well as the descending (bear) and ascending (bull) market subperiods, classified either according to the NBER method or the regime switching model. Our results indicate that SRI funds outperform their peers over the entire sample period. Additionally, regardless of the method used to the identify market condition or the asset pricing model employed, SRI funds as a group significantly outperform their conventional counterparts during bull markets but insignificantly so during bear markets. However, all-equity SRI funds and those that includes Equity and Fixed Income funds, significantly outperform their peers under either regime, with both methods and for all asset pricing specifications. Further examination indicates that the main driver of differences in the performance of SRI funds and their conventional peers can be attributed to their superior selection ability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.