Abstract

Porcine pancreatic lipase contains two SH groups (SH 1 and SH 11). The SH 1 group is reactive in the native enzyme towards sulfhydryl reagents such as 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic) acid, p-chloromercuribenzoate and N-ethylmaleimide, but not towards iodoacetate and iodoacetamide. The SH 11 group is unreactive except towards phenylmercuric ions. Both groups are reactive towards all reagents in the presence of 0.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate or 8 M urea. These observations led to the preparation of two well-defined S-substituted lipase derivatives: mono 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB) lipase in which the SH 1 group was selectively blocked by a TNB radical and diphenyl mercuric (DPM) lipase in which the SH 1 and SH 11 groups were both blocked by a phenylmercuric radical. A “mixed” derivative containing a TNB radical on the SH 1 group and a phenylmercuric radical on the SH II group could also be prepared by incubation of mono TNB-lipase with phenylmercuric chloride. All these reactions were found to be fully reversed by incubation with an excess of thiol. An intramolecular thiol-disulfide reaction was observed to occur when mono TNB-lipase was treated with 0.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate or 8 M urea or, although more slowly, when a solution of lipase in these reagents was oxidized by air. This reaction resulted in the formation of an additional disulfide bridge in the lipase molecule. The kinetic parameters K m and v max of the hydrolysis of emulsified triglycerides by mono TNB-lipase, DPM-lipase and native lipase were determined and compared. Substitution of the SH 1 group by a TNB radical induced a 10-fold increase in K m whereas v max was unaffected. Substitution of both the SH 1 and SH 11 groups by a phenylmercuric radical induced a 40% decrease in v max while K m was unchanged. Lipase regenerated by thiols from the derivatives had exactly the same parameters as the native enzyme. A possible interpretation of these data is that the SH 1 group is at or near the site responsible for the attachment of lipase at hydrophobic interfaces whereas the SH 11 group is near the catalytic site. The properties of both groups suggest that they are situated in an hydrophobic region of the molecule.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.