Abstract

This paper presents the study of reduced-form approach and hybrid model for the valuation of credit risk. Credit risk arises whenever a borrower is expecting to use future cash flows to pay a current debt. It is closely tied to the potential return of investment, the most notable being that the yields on bonds correlate strongly to their perceived credit risk. Credit risk embedded in a financial transaction, is the risk that at least one of the parties involved in the transaction will suffer a financial loss due to decline in creditworthiness of the counter-party to the transaction or perhaps of some third party. Reduced-form approach is known as intensity-based approach. This is purely probabilistic in nature and technically speaking it has a lot in common with the reliability theory. Here the value of firm is not modeled but specifically the default risk is related either by a deterministic default intensity function or more general by stochastic intensity. Hybrid model combines the structural and intensity-based approaches. While avoiding their difficulties, it picks the best features of both approaches, the economic and intuitive appeal of the structural approach and the tractability and empirical fit of the intensity-based approach.

Highlights

  • As stock markets have become more sophisticated, so have their products

  • We can distinguish between the reduced-form models that are only concerned with the modelling of default time, and that are referred to as the intensity-based models, and the reduced form models with migrations between credit rating classes called the credit migration models

  • We have in our disposal two models for the valuation of credit risk named the reduced-form model and the hybrid model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As stock markets have become more sophisticated, so have their products. The simple buy or sell trades of the early markets have been replaced by more complex financial options and derivatives. The first category of credit risk models are the ones based on the original framework developed by Merton [1] They derived an explicit formula for risky bonds which can be used both to estimate the probability of default of a firm and to estimate the yield differential between a risk bond and a default-free bond. Black and Cox [2] introduced the possibility of more complex capital structure with subordinated debts, using the principles of option pricing Black and Scholes [3] In such a framework, the default process of a company is driven by the value of the company’s assets and the risk of a firm’s default is explicitly linked to the variability of the firm’s asset value. Duffie and Singleton [6] followed with a model that when market value at default (recovery rate) is exogenously specified, allows for closed-form solutions for term-structure of credit spreads. In this paper we shall consider reducedform approach and hybrid model for the valuation of credit risk

Reduced-Form Model
Hazard Function
Martingale Hazard Function Lemma 5
Default Table Bonds
Hazard Processes
Hazard Process of a Random Time
Terminal Payoff
Recovery Process
Defaultable Bonds
Functional Recovery of Par Value
Fractional Recovery of Treasury Value
3.10. Choice of a Recovery Scheme
Hybrid Model
Conclusion
Advantages of Reduced-Form Model
Disadvantages of Reduced-Form Model
Advantages of Hybrid Model
Disadvantages of Hybrid Model
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.