Abstract

Agroforestry systems provide important ecosystem functions and services. They have the potential to enrich agricultural monocultures in central Europe with structural elements otherwise absent, which is expected to be accompanied by a surplus of ecosystem functions. Here we used quantitative measures derived from terrestrial laser scanning in single-scan mode to describe the structural complexity, the canopy openness, the foliage height diversity and the understory complexity of four common agroforest systems in central Europe. We accessed silvopasture systems with grazing ponies and cattle as well as fellow deer, short rotation forests with agricultural use between the tree rows, tree orchards with grazing sheep and Christmas tree plantations on which chickens forage. As a reference, we used data for 65 forest sites across Germany, representing different forest types, various dominant tree species, stand ages and management systems. We found that overall stand structural complexity is ranked as follows: forest > silvopasture systems > short rotation forest > tree orchard > Christmas tree plantation. Consequently, if overall structural complexity of an agricultural landscape shall be enriched, there is now strong evidence on how this may be achieved using agroforests. However, if the focus lies on selected structures that serve specific functions, e.g. dense understory to provide animal shelter, specific types of agroforests may be chosen and the ranking in overall structural complexity may be less important.

Highlights

  • It is documented that a reliable structural characterization of different forest types can be performed using the SSCI obtained from single scans when about nine

  • While forests clearly provide the greatest complexity in terms of the overall highest mean and median SSCI. Value detected, they showed the greatest variability. This can be explained by the large number of different forest management systems included in our study in order to provide a solid reference across stand ages, dominating tree species, and management regimes

  • We could show that selected attributes of complexity may be more pronounced in agroforestry systems than in forests, such as the understory complexity in SRFs, and thereby promote specific ecosystem functions or services

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Since our aim was to characterize the different management systems, we followed the nine-scansper-hectare protocol, resulting in at least 18 scans per system that were used to characterize structures

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call