Abstract
AbstractTwo simple methods commonly used to detect asymmetry in climate research, composite analysis, and asymmetric linear regression, are discussed and compared using mathematical derivation and synthetic data. Asymmetric regression is shown to provide unbiased estimates only when the respective mean of positive and negative events is removed from both independent and dependent variables (i.e., non‐zero y‐intercepts). Composite analysis always provides biased results and strongly underestimates the asymmetry, albeit less so for very larger thresholds, which cannot be used with limited observational data. Hence, the unbiased asymmetric regression should be used, even though uncertainties can be large for small samples. Differences in estimated asymmetry are illustrated for the sea surface temperature and winter sea level pressure signals associated with El Niño and La Niña.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
