Abstract

Abstract. It is still an open question how equilibrium warming in response to increasing radiative forcing – the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity S – depends on background climate. We here present palaeodata-based evidence on the state dependency of S, by using CO2 proxy data together with a 3-D ice-sheet-model-based reconstruction of land ice albedo over the last 5 million years (Myr). We find that the land ice albedo forcing depends non-linearly on the background climate, while any non-linearity of CO2 radiative forcing depends on the CO2 data set used. This non-linearity has not, so far, been accounted for in similar approaches due to previously more simplistic approximations, in which land ice albedo radiative forcing was a linear function of sea level change. The latitudinal dependency of ice-sheet area changes is important for the non-linearity between land ice albedo and sea level. In our set-up, in which the radiative forcing of CO2 and of the land ice albedo (LI) is combined, we find a state dependence in the calculated specific equilibrium climate sensitivity, S[CO2,LI], for most of the Pleistocene (last 2.1 Myr). During Pleistocene intermediate glaciated climates and interglacial periods, S[CO2,LI] is on average ~ 45 % larger than during Pleistocene full glacial conditions. In the Pliocene part of our analysis (2.6–5 Myr BP) the CO2 data uncertainties prevent a well-supported calculation for S[CO2,LI], but our analysis suggests that during times without a large land ice area in the Northern Hemisphere (e.g. before 2.82 Myr BP), the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity, S[CO2,LI], was smaller than during interglacials of the Pleistocene. We thus find support for a previously proposed state change in the climate system with the widespread appearance of northern hemispheric ice sheets. This study points for the first time to a so far overlooked non-linearity in the land ice albedo radiative forcing, which is important for similar palaeodata-based approaches to calculate climate sensitivity. However, the implications of this study for a suggested warming under CO2 doubling are not yet entirely clear since the details of necessary corrections for other slow feedbacks are not fully known and the uncertainties that exist in the ice-sheet simulations and global temperature reconstructions are large.

Highlights

  • One measure to describe the potential anthropogenic impact on climate is the equilibrium global annual mean surface air temperature rise caused by the radiative forcing of a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration

  • In the Pliocene part of our analysis (2.6–5 million years (Myr) BP) the CO2 data uncertainties prevent a well-supported calculation for S[CO2,land ice albedo (LI)], but our analysis suggests that during times without a large land ice area in the Northern Hemisphere, the specific equilibrium climate sensitivity, S[CO2,LI], was smaller than during interglacials of the Pleistocene

  • ( Tg2, orange line), fpa varies as a step function with high values for the Pleistocene and low values for the Pliocene with the step between both values occurring at 2.82 Myr BP, when our results indicate large changes in Northern Hemisphere (NH) land ice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One measure to describe the potential anthropogenic impact on climate is the equilibrium global annual mean surface air temperature rise caused by the radiative forcing of a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration. While this quantity, called equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), can be calculated from climate models Vial et al, 2013), it is important for model validation to make estimates based on palaeodata. This is especially relevant since some important feedbacks of the climate system are not incorporated into all models. Köhler et al.: State dependency of the equilibrium climate sensitivity interactively to a model of stratospheric chemistry, including ozone, the calculated transient warming on a 100-year timescale differs by 20 % from results without such an interactive coupling (Nowack et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call