Abstract
The authors examine how existing pole-placement algorithms work in the case of a saturating input. The stability of such algorithms and the modifications needed to make them work in the case of saturation are examined. The net result is that the analysis of G.C. Goodwin and K.S. Sin (1984) can be slightly modified to prove the stability of adaptive pole-placement, but only for the case where the plant is stable. It is shown that, for unstable plants, it is possible to push the plant into a state from which it cannot be returned to the origin (with a saturating input). Thus, it is fairly easy to generate examples of instability in the adaptive control system that would not exist with unbounded control authority.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.