Abstract
In this paper a comparison of classical metaheuristic techniques over different sizes of petrochemical blending problems is presented. Three problems are taken from the literature and used for initial comparisons and parameter setting. A fourth instance of real world size is then introduced and the best performing algorithm of each type is then applied to it. Random search techniques, such as blind random search and local random search, deliver fair results for the smaller instances. Within the class of genetic algorithms the best results for all three problems were obtained using ranked fitness assignment with tournament selection. Good results are also obtained by means of continuous tabu search approaches. A simulated annealing approach also yielded fair results. Comparisons of the results for the different approaches shows that the tabu search technique delivers the best results with respect to solution quality and execution time for all of the three smaller problems under consideration. However, simulated annealing delivers the best result with respect to solution quality and execution time for the introduced real world size problem.
Highlights
In blending problems the aim is to determine the best blend of available ingredients to form a certain quantity of a product under strict specifications
The objective of this study is to present a comparison of the performance of the different types of classical metaheuristics when applied to typical petrochemical blending problems
A confidence level of 90% was obtained by calculating the average objective function values for the Blind random search (BRS) after 9, 8 335 and 4 046 algorithm runs for the simplified sample problem (SSP), Haverly pooling problem (HPP) and Marco mini-refinery problem (MMRP), respectively
Summary
In blending problems the aim is to determine the best blend of available ingredients to form a certain quantity of a product under strict specifications. The objective of this study is to present a comparison of the performance of the different types of classical metaheuristics when applied to typical petrochemical blending problems. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there exists no application or comparison of any metaheuristic approaches to petrochemical blending problems in the academic literature. The comparison of these metaheuristics was chosen because a petrochemical company wanted to know how classical metaheuristic approaches compare with each other and their current methods. The best performing metaheuristics from the previous sections are applied to this instance and the results discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.