Abstract
This article criticizes arguments for a supposed shamanistic substratum in European vernacular culture during the early modern period, especially those set forth by Ginzburg, Pócs, and Wilby. Although their work brings to light important historical material, the data do not support such a wide-ranging theory. Rather it seems to depend on a reified notion of both ‘shamanism’ and Christianity. Certainly, there are phenomenological similarities between the cases they discuss, but these can also be extended to Christianity and other cultures. On the premisses used by the three scholars, Christianity qualifies as a form of ‘shamanism’, and shamanism as a form of ‘religion’—a conclusion which alerts us to the challenges pertaining to the generic use of the term ‘shamanism’ outside the sphere of its cultural origin.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
