Abstract
AbstractRecently, Liu et al. proposed the smoothed finite element method by using the non‐mapped shape functions and then introducing the strain smoothing operator when evaluating the element stiffness in the framework of the finite element method. However, the theories and examples by Liu et al. are not sufficient for general quadrilateral elements. This paper shows that the non‐mapped shape functions used in the smoothed finite element have disadvantages in existence, linearity, non‐negativity and patch test. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
